GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L
GLDI.L (IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP) and 3GOO.L (Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while 3GOO.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index. GLDI.L is actively managed, while 3GOO.L is passively managed. Over the past year, GLDI.L returned 10.28% vs 438.76% for 3GOO.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDI.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3GOO.L.
Performance
GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDI.L is traded in USD, while 3GOO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3GOO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDI.L achieves a -10.92% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOO.L's 32.87% return.
GLDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- 6M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -10.92%
- 1Y
- 10.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3GOO.L
- 1D
- 6.99%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 32.87%
- 1Y
- 438.76%
- 3Y*
- 95.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDI.L IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP | -10.92% | 56.02% | 2.95% |
3GOO.L Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP | 32.87% | 164.65% | 49.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDI.L and 3GOO.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2024 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLDI.L
3GOO.L
GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDI.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.49 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 8.30 | -7.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | 22.41 | -21.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDI.L drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum 3GOO.L drawdown of -89.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI.L and 3GOO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDI.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -89.39% | +64.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.40% | -52.44% | +28.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -68.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.19% | -24.67% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -43.93% | +38.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.66% | 19.46% | -8.80% |
Volatility
GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) is 6.23%, while Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) has a volatility of 22.44%. This indicates that GLDI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDI.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 22.44% | -16.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.64% | 60.12% | -40.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.88% | 88.35% | -65.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 92.51% | -73.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 90.26% | -70.87% |
GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDI.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than 3GOO.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDI.L vs. 3GOO.L - Dividend Comparison
GLDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, while 3GOO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
3GOO.L Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLDI.L IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP | 7.18% | 6.28% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDI.L and 3GOO.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDI.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDI.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3GOO.L.
GLDI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 3GOO.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GLDI.L and 0.75% for 3GOO.L.
Find the right allocation for GLDI.L and 3GOO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer