PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLDI.L is traded in USD, while 2MU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2MU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDI.L achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than 2MU.L's 888.37% return.


GLDI.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
1.32%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

2MU.L

1D
3.62%
1M
263.38%
YTD
888.37%
6M
1,371.80%
1Y
6,470.85%
3Y*
308.64%
5Y*
97.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GLDI.L
IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP
-0.59%61.04%6.19%
2MU.L
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP
888.37%599.32%-49.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDI.L and 2MU.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDI.L
GLDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

2MU.L
2MU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
2MU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
2MU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDI.L2MU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-48.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.93

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

119.30

-117.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.38

419.56

-415.18

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the 2MU.L Sharpe Ratio of 49.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDI.L and 2MU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDI.L2MU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

49.72

-48.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.75

1.00

+0.75

Drawdowns

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDI.L drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum 2MU.L drawdown of -89.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI.L and 2MU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDI.L2MU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-89.07%

+72.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.47%

-53.34%

+36.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.92%

0.00%

-14.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-46.26%

+42.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

15.20%

-8.81%

Volatility

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) is 4.55%, while Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a volatility of 53.90%. This indicates that GLDI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2MU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDI.L2MU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

53.90%

-49.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.56%

96.57%

-78.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.68%

128.22%

-106.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

105.79%

-86.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

101.89%

-83.09%

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDI.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than 2MU.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDI.L vs. 2MU.L - Dividend Comparison

GLDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, while 2MU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
2MU.L
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLDI.L
IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP
12.72%9.15%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDI.L and 2MU.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDI.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDI.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2MU.L.

GLDI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 2MU.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GLDI.L and 0.75% for 2MU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDI.L and 2MU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer