PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GLDE.L (IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP) and ISEM.L (IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP) are both Derivative Income funds. GLDE.L is actively managed, while ISEM.L is passively managed. GLDE.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ISEM.L.

Performance

GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP (ISEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

GLDE.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ISEM.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP

IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP

Often compared with GLDE.L:
GLDE.L vs. RMAP.LGLDE.L vs. SPYGLDE.L vs. TSLD.LGLDE.L vs. MSTI.LGLDE.L vs. IGLN.LGLDE.L vs. JEGA.LGLDE.L vs. CEGI.L
Often compared with ISEM.L:
ISEM.L vs. JEPE.LISEM.L vs. CEGI.LISEM.L vs. GOOI.LISEM.L vs. SLVI.LISEM.L vs. JEPI.LISEM.L vs. AMDI.LISEM.L vs. QQQO.L

Return for Risk

GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP (ISEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility

GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDE.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ISEM.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLDE.L vs. ISEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDE.L nor ISEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

On fees, GLDE.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDE.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ISEM.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and IncomeShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GLDE.L and 0.45% for ISEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDE.L and ISEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer