PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDB vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDB vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDB achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


GLDB

1D
-2.17%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
-7.90%
6M
-6.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDB vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLDB and OILK is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDB vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDB

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDB vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLDB vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDBOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.12

-0.56

Drawdowns

GLDB vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDB drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDB and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDBOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-83.76%

+56.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.71%

-3.66%

-23.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.44%

-32.61%

+19.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.56%

Volatility

GLDB vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDBOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.96%

28.75%

+11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.96%

30.12%

+9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.96%

35.97%

+3.99%

GLDB vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDB vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

GLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLDB
Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF
0.21%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDB and OILK have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLDB.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.21% for GLDB.

GLDB is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while OILK is Oil & Gas. GLDB tracks Solactive Gold Backed Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GLDB and 0.68% for OILK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDB and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer