GLDB vs. AGZD
Compare and contrast key facts about Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD).
GLDB and AGZD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDB is a passively managed fund by Strategy Shares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Backed Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on May 17, 2021. AGZD is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. It was launched on Dec 18, 2013. Both GLDB and AGZD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLDB vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDB vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDB Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | -2.60% | -3.51% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 1.24% | 0.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDB achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than AGZD's 1.24% return.
GLDB
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDB vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDB vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
GLDB
AGZD
GLDB vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDB | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 0.63 | -0.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDB and AGZD is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLDB vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
GLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than AGZD's 4.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDB Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 4.07% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
GLDB vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDB drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDB and AGZD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDB | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -8.46% | -18.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.48% | 0.00% | -22.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -0.78% | -9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility
GLDB vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDB | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.68% | 3.46% | +41.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.68% | 3.56% | +41.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.68% | 3.79% | +40.89% |