PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -6.21% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 11.29%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-12.97%
YTD
-6.21%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
27.30%
5Y*
17.00%
10Y*
11.29%
ALL TIME*
10.28%

YCS

1D
-2.97%
1M
-5.17%
6M
5.08%
YTD
4.11%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
22.90%
10Y*
13.21%
ALL TIME*
6.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.42B$2.35B$2.72B
$2.37M$2.29M$1.56M

GLD vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-6.21%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
4.11%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and YCS is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008

-0.37

The correlation between GLD and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (10 years) to -0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLD vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.53

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

9.53

-7.88

GLD vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-49.56%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

-8.48%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.40%

-23.05%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-27.32%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.40%

-27.32%

+0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.04%

-8.48%

-16.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-19.75%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.29%

2.24%

+10.05%

Volatility

GLD vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) have volatilities of 6.05% and 5.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

5.88%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.95%

11.84%

+9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.11%

16.43%

+11.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

21.21%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

18.61%

-2.47%

GLD vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLD nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and YCS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to YCS (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.21% vs 11.29% for GLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.21% return vs 11.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

GLD and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer