PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. RSPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. RSPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than RSPU's 6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has outperformed RSPU with an annualized return of 12.15%, while RSPU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-9.52%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%

RSPU

1D
1.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
6.94%
6M
7.66%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
9.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. RSPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
6.94%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and RSPU is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. RSPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. RSPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDRSPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.67

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

3.77

-0.96

GLD vs. RSPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the RSPU Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and RSPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. RSPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum RSPU drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and RSPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDRSPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-48.08%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-8.46%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

-16.27%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-21.86%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-36.85%

+12.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.05%

-5.28%

-16.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-7.85%

-8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

3.75%

+4.74%

Volatility

GLD vs. RSPU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) at 5.41%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDRSPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

5.41%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.10%

11.11%

+12.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

14.10%

+13.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

16.95%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

19.10%

-3.02%

GLD vs. RSPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLD and RSPU have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

GLD vs. RSPU - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.49%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and RSPU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to RSPU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs RSPU's -48.08%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.15% vs 9.57% for RSPU. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.15% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD and RSPU have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while RSPU is Utilities Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco.

RSPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and RSPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer