GLD vs. ITOT
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLD returned 12.15%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for ITOT. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
GLD vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 9.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 12.15%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
GLD vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 9.69% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and ITOT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004 | 0.07 |
The correlation between GLD and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLD vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLD
ITOT
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GLD
ITOT
Communication Services
GLD
-
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
GLD
-
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
GLD
-
ITOT
Energy
GLD
-
ITOT
Financial Services
GLD
-
ITOT
Healthcare
GLD
-
ITOT
Industrials
GLD
-
ITOT
Real Estate
GLD
-
ITOT
Technology
GLD
-
ITOT
Utilities
GLD
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
ITOT
GLD vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 2.80 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | 12.50 | -9.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLD vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -55.20% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.46% | -8.90% | -15.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.46% | -19.44% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.46% | -25.36% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.46% | -35.00% | +10.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.05% | -2.12% | -19.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -6.96% | -9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.49% | 1.99% | +6.50% |
Volatility
GLD vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 4.57%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 4.57% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.10% | 9.85% | +14.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.37% | 12.69% | +14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 17.43% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 18.29% | -2.21% |
GLD vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLD vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.99% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and ITOT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to ITOT (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.99% vs 12.15% for GLD. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GLD is categorized as Gold, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer