GLD vs. IGLD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and IGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both Gold funds. GLD is passively managed, while IGLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLD returned 17.04%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for IGLD. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.

Performance

GLD vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -7.67% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -8.71% return.

GLD

• 1D: -3.02%
• 1M: -11.58%
• YTD: -7.67%
• 6M: -11.17%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 17.04%
• 10Y*: 11.25%

IGLD

• 1D: -3.35%
• 1M: -11.16%
• YTD: -8.71%
• 6M: -11.20%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 11.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	-7.67%	63.68%	26.66%	12.69%	-0.77%	5.26%
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	-8.71%	47.46%	19.36%	9.24%	-2.34%	4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and IGLD is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021	0.93

The correlation between GLD and IGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLD vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD

GLD Risk / Return Rank: 21
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 23
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 19

IGLD

IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 17
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 18
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLD	IGLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.50	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	0.81	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.12	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	0.52	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	1.57	+0.55

GLD vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLD vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -23.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and IGLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLD	IGLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.56%	-23.84%	-21.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.21%	-23.84%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.21%	-23.84%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.21%	-23.84%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.21%	-23.84%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.17%	-5.38%	-10.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.24%	7.82%	+1.42%

Volatility

GLD vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) have volatilities of 8.58% and 8.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLD	IGLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	8.66%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.57%	22.59%	+1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.75%	24.64%	+3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	15.55%	+2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	15.36%	+0.71%

GLD vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLD vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.96%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	19.96%	9.91%	20.81%	7.85%	4.45%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLD and IGLD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, GLD and IGLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GLD or IGLD?

IGLD has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to GLD (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs IGLD's -23.84%.

Which ETF is better, GLD or IGLD?

On 5-year performance, GLD leads with 17.04% vs 11.90% for IGLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLD or IGLD?

Over the 5-year period, GLD has performed better with a 17.04% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLD or IGLD?

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLD or IGLD?

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.96%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

What is the main difference between GLD and IGLD?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.85% for IGLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.