GLD vs. IAUI
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. GLD is passively managed, while IAUI is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.
Performance
GLD vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than IAUI's 1.64% return.
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
IAUI
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 28.12% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 1.64% | 20.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and IAUI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
IAUI
GLD vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLD | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLD | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.13 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
GLD vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -16.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and IAUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -16.88% | -28.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.75% | -13.80% | -3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -3.45% | -12.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | — | — |
Volatility
GLD vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.61% | 20.31% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 20.31% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 20.31% | -4.36% |
GLD vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLD vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 12.65% | 6.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GLD and IAUI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.
IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.65%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GLD is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.78% for IAUI.
Find the right allocation for GLD and IAUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer