GLD vs. IAUI
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. GLD is passively managed, while IAUI is actively managed. Over the past year, GLD returned 19.51% vs 10.68% for IAUI. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.
Performance
GLD vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -7.67% return, which is significantly higher than IAUI's -8.62% return.
GLD
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- -7.67%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
IAUI
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -10.97%
- YTD
- -8.62%
- 6M
- -10.82%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -7.67% | 27.47% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | -8.62% | 20.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and IAUI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.97 |
The correlation between GLD and IAUI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
IAUI
GLD vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLD | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.48 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.12 | 1.53 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLD vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and IAUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -22.50% | -23.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.21% | -22.50% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.21% | -22.50% | -3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -4.20% | -11.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.24% | 7.01% | +2.23% |
Volatility
GLD vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) have volatilities of 8.58% and 8.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 8.26% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 20.07% | +4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.75% | 21.66% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 21.25% | -2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 21.25% | -5.18% |
GLD vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLD vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 15.28% | 6.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, GLD and IAUI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GLD has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to IAUI (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs IAUI's -22.50%.
On 1-year performance, GLD leads with 19.51% vs 10.68% for IAUI. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IAUI has been the lower-risk option at 8.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLD has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.
IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 15.28%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GLD is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.78% for IAUI.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and IAUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer