PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 12.15%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%

DXJ

1D
0.74%
1M
0.35%
YTD
18.74%
6M
19.84%
1Y
54.41%
3Y*
30.91%
5Y*
26.01%
10Y*
18.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
18.74%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and DXJ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

-0.02

The correlation between GLD and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (10 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.54

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

4.88

-3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

18.93

-16.12

GLD vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-49.63%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-10.98%

-13.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

-22.19%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-22.19%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-39.14%

+14.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.05%

-1.34%

-20.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-14.32%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

2.83%

+5.66%

Volatility

GLD vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.64%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

4.64%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.10%

13.56%

+10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

17.73%

+9.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

19.02%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

20.17%

-4.09%

GLD vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.09%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and DXJ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to DXJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.72% vs 12.15% for GLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while DXJ is Japan Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer