GLD vs. 4GLD.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE).
GLD and 4GLD.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM. It was launched on Nov 18, 2004. 4GLD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xetra that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Nov 27, 2007. Both GLD and 4GLD.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLD vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLD vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 8.57% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold ETF | 5.41% | 68.58% | 26.88% | 12.77% | 1.22% | -4.18% | 24.10% | 18.68% | -1.65% | 12.24% |
Different Trading Currencies
GLD is traded in USD, while 4GLD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 4GLD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's 5.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 13.92% annualized return and 4GLD.DE not far ahead at 14.33%.
GLD
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 49.33%
- 3Y*
- 32.92%
- 5Y*
- 21.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -11.37%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 6M
- 20.79%
- 1Y
- 48.48%
- 3Y*
- 32.93%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLD vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
4GLD.DE
GLD vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLD | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.88 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.37 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.82 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 10.89 | -0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLD | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.88 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.92 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.54 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and 4GLD.DE is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLD vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLD nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLD vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, roughly equal to the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -44.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and 4GLD.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -36.79% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.21% | -16.54% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | -16.54% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.00% | -18.23% | -3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -11.47% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -11.83% | -4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 4.34% | +0.86% |
Volatility
GLD vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) at 10.44%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.06% | 10.44% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.30% | 21.39% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.80% | 25.69% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 17.00% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 15.44% | +0.43% |