GLCR vs. RFEU
GLCR (GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF) and RFEU (First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF) are both Europe Equities funds. GLCR is passively managed, while RFEU is actively managed. Over the past year, GLCR returned -7.32% vs 13.97% for RFEU. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLCR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for RFEU.
Performance
GLCR vs. RFEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLCR achieves a -10.49% return, which is significantly lower than RFEU's 1.50% return.
GLCR
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -10.49%
- 6M
- -3.88%
- 1Y
- -7.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFEU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
GLCR vs. RFEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLCR GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF | -10.49% | 8.04% |
RFEU First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF | 1.50% | 19.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLCR and RFEU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.38 |
GLCR vs. RFEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLCR
RFEU
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
GLCR
RFEU
Consumer Defensive
GLCR
RFEU
Healthcare
GLCR
RFEU
Real Estate
GLCR
RFEU
-
Industrials
GLCR
RFEU
Consumer Cyclical
GLCR
RFEU
Basic Materials
GLCR
RFEU
Communication Services
GLCR
RFEU
Energy
GLCR
-
RFEU
Technology
GLCR
-
RFEU
Utilities
GLCR
-
RFEU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLCR vs. RFEU — Risk / Return Rank
GLCR
RFEU
GLCR vs. RFEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLCR | RFEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.39 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 2.99 | -3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 10.93 | -12.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLCR | RFEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 | 1.77 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.41 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
GLCR vs. RFEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLCR drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, smaller than the maximum RFEU drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCR and RFEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLCR | RFEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -39.74% | +22.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.79% | -5.15% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.79% | -0.11% | -16.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -9.62% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 1.35% | +4.67% |
Volatility
GLCR vs. RFEU - Volatility Comparison
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) at 0.00%. This indicates that GLCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLCR | RFEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 0.00% | +7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 4.43% | +8.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 8.73% | +7.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 16.77% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 17.86% | +0.76% |
GLCR vs. RFEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLCR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RFEU's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLCR vs. RFEU - Dividend Comparison
GLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than RFEU's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLCR GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF | 1.08% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFEU First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF | 2.83% | 2.87% | 5.45% | 3.37% | 4.98% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 3.08% | 2.84% | 1.35% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLCR and RFEU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLCR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLCR dropped -16.79% vs RFEU's -39.74%.
On 1-year performance, RFEU leads with 13.97% vs -7.32% for GLCR. On fees, RFEU is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RFEU has performed better with a 13.97% return vs -7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFEU is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLCR.
RFEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.08% for GLCR.
They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GLCR and 0.83% for RFEU.
RFEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLCR and RFEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer