PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLCC.TO achieves a -10.57% return, which is significantly lower than UTES.TO's 12.01% return.


GLCC.TO

1D
0.76%
1M
-5.71%
6M
-19.82%
YTD
-10.57%
1Y
41.43%
3Y*
36.35%
5Y*
20.11%
10Y*
11.77%

UTES.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
-2.82%
6M
13.65%
YTD
12.01%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
-10.57%137.43%-2.00%
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
12.01%18.66%-4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GLCC.TO and UTES.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.08

The correlation between GLCC.TO and UTES.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLCC.TO
GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLCC.TOUTES.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

3.14

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

9.21

-6.27

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLCC.TO and UTES.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.37%, which is greater than UTES.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCC.TO and UTES.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLCC.TOUTES.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.37%

-10.19%

-71.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.03%

-6.39%

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.21%

-3.11%

-28.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.01%

-2.57%

-50.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

2.18%

+11.94%

Volatility

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) at 4.69%. This indicates that GLCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLCC.TOUTES.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.65%

4.69%

+7.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.98%

8.28%

+28.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.40%

10.24%

+34.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.68%

11.30%

+21.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.33%

11.30%

+21.03%

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLCC.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLCC.TO vs. UTES.TO - Dividend Comparison

GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.34%, less than UTES.TO's 17.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
10.34%6.01%10.30%11.16%10.08%6.31%6.47%4.58%5.62%7.08%8.75%2.32%
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
17.83%18.30%6.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLCC.TO and UTES.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTES.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTES.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GLCC.TO and 0.60% for UTES.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLCC.TO and UTES.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer