GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO
GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) and LLHE.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GLCC.TO returned 48.60% vs 45.65% for LLHE.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLCC.TO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LLHE.TO.
Performance
GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLCC.TO achieves a -5.15% return, which is significantly lower than LLHE.TO's 9.58% return.
GLCC.TO
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -5.15%
- 6M
- -3.63%
- 1Y
- 48.60%
- 3Y*
- 40.00%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
LLHE.TO
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 14.22%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 45.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | -5.15% | 137.43% | -9.20% |
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 9.58% | 29.60% | -15.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLCC.TO and LLHE.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GLCC.TO
LLHE.TO
GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLCC.TO | LLHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.88 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 4.82 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.37%, which is greater than LLHE.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCC.TO and LLHE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLCC.TO | LLHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.37% | -37.80% | -43.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.03% | -25.14% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.04% | -1.68% | -25.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.15% | -13.49% | -39.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.60% | 9.78% | +1.82% |
Volatility
GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.63% compared to Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) at 8.25%. This indicates that GLCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLHE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLCC.TO | LLHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.63% | 8.25% | +8.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.94% | 29.06% | +6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.26% | 40.10% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.35% | 41.56% | -9.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 41.56% | -9.40% |
GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLCC.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LLHE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLCC.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Dividend Comparison
GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, less than LLHE.TO's 20.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 9.12% | 6.01% | 10.30% | 11.16% | 10.08% | 6.31% | 6.47% | 4.58% | 5.62% | 7.08% | 8.75% | 2.32% |
LLHE.TO Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 20.22% | 20.89% | 7.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLCC.TO and LLHE.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LLHE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLHE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GLCC.TO and 0.40% for LLHE.TO.
Find the right allocation for GLCC.TO and LLHE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer