PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) and CBNK.TO (Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLCC.TO returned 40.99%/yr vs 38.97%/yr for CBNK.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLCC.TO achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than CBNK.TO's 25.56% return.

GLCC.TO

1D
-2.75%
1M
1.61%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
4.96%
1Y
60.20%
3Y*
40.99%
5Y*
21.30%
10Y*
14.52%

CBNK.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
7.74%
YTD
25.56%
6M
32.17%
1Y
79.20%
3Y*
38.97%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF		-0.45%137.43%20.18%6.19%-9.45%
CBNK.TO
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF		25.56%51.67%27.42%8.42%-19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GLCC.TO and CBNK.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2022

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF

Often compared with GLCC.TO:
GLCC.TO vs. AMAX.TOGLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TOGLCC.TO vs. IGLDGLCC.TO vs. GLDI.LGLCC.TO vs. BCCCGLCC.TO vs. WAF.AXGLCC.TO vs. 4GLD.DE
Often compared with CBNK.TO:
CBNK.TO vs. BANK.TOCBNK.TO vs. BKCL.TOCBNK.TO vs. YGOG.NEOCBNK.TO vs. CANY.TOCBNK.TO vs. NXF.TOCBNK.TO vs. ECHI.TOCBNK.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLCC.TO
GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO
CBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GLCC.TOCBNK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.45
5.12

-3.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.86
6.76

-4.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.87

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

7.94

-5.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

34.25

-28.56

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the CBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLCC.TO and CBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GLCC.TOCBNK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

5.12

-3.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

1.10

-1.10

Drawdowns

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than CBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCC.TO and CBNK.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GLCC.TOCBNK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-32.12%

-39.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.86%

-10.03%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.86%

-17.92%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.43%

-2.29%

-21.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.43%

-10.92%

-23.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.61%

2.32%

+8.29%

Volatility

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.96% compared to Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO) at 5.67%. This indicates that GLCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GLCC.TOCBNK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.96%

5.67%

+9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.13%

13.29%

+20.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.70%

15.55%

+26.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.94%

17.55%

+14.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.95%

17.55%

+14.40%

Dividends

GLCC.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, more than CBNK.TO's 5.94% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBNK.TO
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF		5.94%5.86%8.25%9.59%7.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF		8.69%6.01%10.30%11.16%10.08%6.31%6.47%4.58%5.62%7.09%9.21%11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

GLCC.TO and CBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Mulvihill.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLCC.TO and CBNK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer