GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities (3SLV.DE).
GLCC.TO and 3SLV.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011. 3SLV.DE is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 9, 2022.
Performance
GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 5.98% | 137.43% | 20.18% | 6.19% | 22.18% |
3SLV.DE Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities | -63.05% | 898.16% | 29.65% | -32.87% | 60.23% |
Different Trading Currencies
GLCC.TO is traded in CAD, while 3SLV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3SLV.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLCC.TO achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than 3SLV.DE's -63.05% return.
GLCC.TO
- 1D
- 5.95%
- 1M
- -18.48%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 86.11%
- 3Y*
- 43.56%
- 5Y*
- 25.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.68%
3SLV.DE
- 1D
- 10.88%
- 1M
- -55.60%
- YTD
- -63.05%
- 6M
- 31.85%
- 1Y
- 160.69%
- 3Y*
- 51.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLCC.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than 3SLV.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GLCC.TO
3SLV.DE
GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities (3SLV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLCC.TO | 3SLV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 0.99 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 2.11 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 1.83 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | 4.59 | +7.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLCC.TO | 3SLV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 0.99 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.53 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLCC.TO and 3SLV.DE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE - Dividend Comparison
GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, while 3SLV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 6.21% | 6.01% | 10.30% | 11.16% | 10.08% | 6.31% | 6.47% | 4.58% | 5.62% | 7.09% | 9.21% | 11.63% |
3SLV.DE Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, smaller than the maximum 3SLV.DE drawdown of -90.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCC.TO and 3SLV.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLCC.TO | 3SLV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -89.93% | +18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.86% | -89.93% | +61.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.48% | -87.16% | +68.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.62% | -26.64% | -7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 35.84% | -28.30% |
Volatility
GLCC.TO vs. 3SLV.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) is 17.09%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities (3SLV.DE) has a volatility of 56.18%. This indicates that GLCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3SLV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLCC.TO | 3SLV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.09% | 56.18% | -39.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.47% | 171.77% | -137.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.29% | 162.14% | -120.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.17% | 109.64% | -78.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.75% | 109.64% | -77.89% |