PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities (3SLV.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3SLV.DE
Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities
-60.64%826.65%26.88%-33.46%45.09%
3GDX.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC
3.34%626.15%-11.69%-21.63%16.61%
Different Trading Currencies

3SLV.DE is traded in EUR, while 3GDX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3GDX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3SLV.DE achieves a -60.64% return, which is significantly lower than 3GDX.L's 3.34% return.


3SLV.DE

1D
6.55%
1M
-42.26%
YTD
-60.64%
6M
32.85%
1Y
170.30%
3Y*
50.03%
5Y*
10Y*

3GDX.L

1D
22.37%
1M
-44.57%
YTD
3.34%
6M
18.94%
1Y
253.31%
3Y*
62.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3SLV.DE and 3GDX.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3SLV.DE
3SLV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
3SLV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SLV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SLV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
3SLV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SLV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

3GDX.L
3GDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
3GDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
3GDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities (3SLV.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3SLV.DE3GDX.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.94

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.35

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.88

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.79

10.82

-6.02

3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3SLV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the 3GDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3SLV.DE and 3GDX.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3SLV.DE3GDX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.94

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.29

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between 3SLV.DE and 3GDX.L is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3SLV.DE nor 3GDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3SLV.DE drawdown since its inception was -89.93%, roughly equal to the maximum 3GDX.L drawdown of -89.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3SLV.DE and 3GDX.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3SLV.DE3GDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.93%

-89.13%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.93%

-69.66%

-20.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.32%

-50.54%

-35.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.71%

-60.70%

+33.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.39%

25.00%

+10.39%

Volatility

3SLV.DE vs. 3GDX.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Silver ETP Securities (3SLV.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) have volatilities of 55.37% and 55.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3SLV.DE3GDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.37%

55.80%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

171.68%

111.58%

+60.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

161.78%

129.82%

+31.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.30%

102.48%

+6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.30%

102.48%

+6.82%