GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L
GLCB.L (SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF) and CSCA.L (iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating)) are both exchange-traded funds - GLCB.L is a Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Refinitiv Global CB TR USD, while CSCA.L is a Canada Equities fund tracking the MSCI Canada Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLCB.L returned 6.26%/yr vs 11.39%/yr for CSCA.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLCB.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CSCA.L.
Performance
GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLCB.L achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than CSCA.L's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GLCB.L has underperformed CSCA.L with an annualized return of 6.26%, while CSCA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.39% annualized return.
GLCB.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 35.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
CSCA.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 33.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLCB.L SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF | 18.03% | 16.97% | 8.82% | 8.16% | -10.86% | -2.14% | 33.15% | 9.84% | -25.44% | 11.93% |
CSCA.L iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) | 9.07% | 27.37% | 14.01% | 7.76% | -1.83% | 25.85% | 2.37% | 21.81% | -12.31% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLCB.L and CSCA.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2014 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLCB.L
CSCA.L
GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF (GLCB.L) and iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) (CSCA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLCB.L | CSCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.56 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.95 | 4.72 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.84 | 19.23 | +3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLCB.L drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum CSCA.L drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCB.L and CSCA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLCB.L | CSCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.82% | -51.79% | +21.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.12% | -7.01% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.41% | -20.19% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.80% | -20.19% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.82% | -33.68% | +3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -1.15% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.81% | -19.14% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.73% | -0.17% |
Volatility
GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF (GLCB.L) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) (CSCA.L) at 2.99%. This indicates that GLCB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSCA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLCB.L | CSCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 2.99% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 7.83% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 11.19% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 19.67% | -9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 18.63% | -5.66% |
GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLCB.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSCA.L's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLCB.L vs. CSCA.L - Dividend Comparison
GLCB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while CSCA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCA.L iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLCB.L SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF | 0.57% | 0.66% | 0.47% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.43% | 0.35% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLCB.L and CSCA.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSCA.L is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSCA.L is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GLCB.L.
GLCB.L is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while CSCA.L is Canada Equities. GLCB.L tracks Refinitiv Global CB TR USD, while CSCA.L tracks MSCI Canada Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GLCB.L and 0.48% for CSCA.L.
Find the right allocation for GLCB.L and CSCA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer