CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L
CSCA.L (iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating)) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSCA.L is a Canada Equities fund tracking the MSCI Canada Index, while IWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSCA.L returned 11.72%/yr vs 13.89%/yr for IWDA.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSCA.L charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.L.
Performance
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSCA.L is traded in GBp, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSCA.L having a 9.66% return and IWDA.L slightly higher at 10.12%. Over the past 10 years, CSCA.L has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 11.72%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.89% annualized return.
CSCA.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 34.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
IWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 27.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCA.L iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) | 9.66% | 27.37% | 14.01% | 7.76% | -1.83% | 24.99% | 3.07% | 21.81% | -12.31% | 5.15% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.28% | 12.41% | 21.19% | 18.05% | -8.38% | 23.34% | 12.65% | 22.29% | -3.62% | 12.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCA.L and IWDA.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010 | 0.57 |
The correlation between CSCA.L and IWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Energy
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Basic Materials
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Industrials
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Technology
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Utilities
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Communication Services
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Real Estate
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
Healthcare
CSCA.L
-
IWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSCA.L
IWDA.L
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) (CSCA.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSCA.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.43 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 4.22 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.98 | 15.90 | +4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSCA.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 2.32 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.90 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.89 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.86 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCA.L and IWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCA.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -26.18% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -6.37% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.18% | -18.91% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.18% | -18.91% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.68% | -26.18% | -7.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -3.39% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.70% | +0.01% |
Volatility
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (USD Accumulating) (CSCA.L) is 1.69%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that CSCA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCA.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 3.47% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 8.85% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 11.62% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 14.49% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 15.51% | +1.49% |
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCA.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCA.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSCA.L nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCA.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSCA.L.
CSCA.L is categorized as Canada Equities, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. CSCA.L tracks MSCI Canada Index, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSCA.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for CSCA.L and IWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer