PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLBL.L is traded in GBP, while AGGG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGGG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLBL.L achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than AGGG.L's 0.12% return.


GLBL.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.87%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
0.11%
3Y*
-2.10%
5Y*
-2.93%
10Y*

AGGG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.65%
YTD
0.12%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
0.83%
5Y*
-0.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
-1.47%-2.39%-2.65%-2.45%-7.22%-5.08%3.70%1.65%7.05%
AGGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist
0.12%0.36%0.28%0.01%-5.93%-4.42%6.16%2.79%8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GLBL.L and AGGG.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018

0.73

The correlation between GLBL.L and AGGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLBL.L
GLBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGG.L
AGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLBL.LAGGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.10

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

0.75

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

1.62

-1.58

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLBL.L and AGGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLBL.LAGGG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

0.54

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

-0.09

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.03

-0.19

Drawdowns

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLBL.L drawdown since its inception was -25.17%, which is greater than AGGG.L's maximum drawdown of -19.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLBL.L and AGGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLBL.LAGGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.17%

-19.27%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

-4.24%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.09%

-5.58%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.62%

-14.34%

-4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.05%

-13.22%

-10.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.84%

-9.35%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.96%

+0.73%

Volatility

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) is 1.36%, while iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that GLBL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLBL.LAGGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.68%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.61%

4.74%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00%

5.84%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.74%

7.71%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.27%

8.33%

-1.06%

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLBL.L and AGGG.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLBL.L vs. AGGG.L - Dividend Comparison

GLBL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than AGGG.L's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist
3.16%2.97%2.74%2.01%1.55%1.33%1.46%1.62%0.96%
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLBL.L and AGGG.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLBL.L and AGGG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLBL.L and AGGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer