PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLBIX vs. PGAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLBIX vs. PGAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) and PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund (PGAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLBIX having a 12.61% return and PGAIX slightly lower at 12.09%. Over the past 10 years, GLBIX has underperformed PGAIX with an annualized return of 6.37%, while PGAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.90% annualized return.


GLBIX

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.09%
6M
7.16%
YTD
12.61%
1Y
21.40%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
6.37%
ALL TIME*
7.33%

PGAIX

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.16%
6M
7.64%
YTD
12.09%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
8.90%
ALL TIME*
7.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GLBIX vs. PGAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLBIX
Leuthold Global Fund
12.61%17.72%1.08%8.32%-7.91%15.01%7.52%9.36%-12.85%16.84%
PGAIX
PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund
12.09%20.68%14.76%12.48%-17.38%11.35%14.57%15.29%-5.15%14.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GLBIX and PGAIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.83

The correlation between GLBIX and PGAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLBIX vs. PGAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLBIX
GLBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GLBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PGAIX
PGAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PGAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PGAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLBIX vs. PGAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) and PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund (PGAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLBIXPGAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.24

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

13.62

-2.79

GLBIX vs. PGAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the PGAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLBIX and PGAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLBIX vs. PGAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLBIX drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, roughly equal to the maximum PGAIX drawdown of -26.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLBIX and PGAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLBIXPGAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-26.75%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-7.29%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.39%

-10.71%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-22.49%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.82%

-26.75%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-0.86%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-4.64%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.73%

+0.23%

Volatility

GLBIX vs. PGAIX - Volatility Comparison

Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund (PGAIX) at 2.15%. This indicates that GLBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLBIXPGAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.15%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

7.29%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.87%

8.54%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.28%

9.82%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.60%

10.20%

-0.60%

GLBIX vs. PGAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLBIX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than PGAIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLBIX vs. PGAIX - Dividend Comparison

GLBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, more than PGAIX's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLBIX
Leuthold Global Fund
8.63%9.71%8.31%2.52%5.18%1.89%0.25%1.04%8.48%9.31%9.66%3.75%
PGAIX
PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund
7.40%1.78%4.27%1.54%1.07%1.10%10.94%2.49%3.12%1.67%1.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLBIX and PGAIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLBIX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to PGAIX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLBIX dropped -26.82% vs PGAIX's -26.75%.

PGAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLBIX and PGAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer