PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLAU.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLAU.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAU.L achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 6.96% return.


GLAU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*

USDV.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.96%
6M
7.95%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
0.41%4.62%3.58%6.07%-11.13%-1.01%5.46%7.95%1.58%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.96%8.78%7.52%1.58%-0.35%25.59%0.26%24.49%-2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GLAU.L and USDV.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.06

Over the past year, GLAU.L and USDV.L have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLAU.L
USDV.L

Financial Services

4.5%
11.5%

Communication Services

0.9%
3.5%

Healthcare

0.8%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
5.2%

Energy

0.7%
4.5%

Utilities

0.6%
14.8%

Industrials

0.6%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
17.0%

Technology

0.5%
8.9%

Real Estate

0.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.2%
6.4%

Financial Services

GLAU.L
4.5%
USDV.L
11.5%

Communication Services

GLAU.L
0.9%
USDV.L
3.5%

Healthcare

GLAU.L
0.8%
USDV.L
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GLAU.L
0.7%
USDV.L
5.2%

Energy

GLAU.L
0.7%
USDV.L
4.5%

Utilities

GLAU.L
0.6%
USDV.L
14.8%

Industrials

GLAU.L
0.6%
USDV.L
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

GLAU.L
0.6%
USDV.L
17.0%

Technology

GLAU.L
0.5%
USDV.L
8.9%

Real Estate

GLAU.L
0.3%
USDV.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

GLAU.L
0.2%
USDV.L
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAU.L
GLAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLAU.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.85

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

4.63

+0.43

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAU.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLAU.LUSDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.41

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.74

+0.09

Drawdowns

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.72%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAU.L and USDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLAU.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-35.73%

+21.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.36%

-6.96%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.11%

-15.11%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.58%

-15.11%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-3.75%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-3.39%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

2.79%

-1.95%

Volatility

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) is 1.56%, while SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that GLAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLAU.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

2.40%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

6.87%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

9.63%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.86%

13.84%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

15.76%

-8.73%

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLAU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLAU.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than USDV.L's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
3.15%3.02%2.71%2.02%1.40%1.21%1.51%1.25%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLAU.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLAU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLAU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

GLAU.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. GLAU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLAU.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLAU.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer