PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLAU.L is traded in USD, while SAAA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SAAA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAU.L achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than SAAA.L's 0.05% return.


GLAU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*

SAAA.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.95%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-3.00%
10Y*
-0.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
0.41%4.62%3.58%6.07%-11.13%-1.01%5.46%7.95%1.58%
SAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.05%10.73%-5.07%7.72%-20.88%-7.79%11.43%5.68%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between GLAU.L and SAAA.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.28

Over the past year, GLAU.L and SAAA.L have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAU.L
GLAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SAAA.L
SAAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SAAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLAU.LSAAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.05

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.38

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

1.01

+4.06

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the SAAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAU.L and SAAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLAU.LSAAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

0.28

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.32

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.05

+0.88

Drawdowns

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.72%, smaller than the maximum SAAA.L drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAU.L and SAAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLAU.LSAAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-33.47%

+18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.36%

-5.38%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.11%

-10.15%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.58%

-31.19%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-17.54%

+16.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-10.72%

+7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

2.05%

-1.21%

Volatility

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) is 1.56%, while iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that GLAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLAU.LSAAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

2.09%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

5.50%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

7.29%

-3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.86%

9.26%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

8.41%

-1.38%

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLAU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SAAA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLAU.L vs. SAAA.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than SAAA.L's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
3.15%3.02%2.71%2.02%1.40%1.21%1.51%1.25%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.68%2.48%2.34%1.57%0.76%0.48%0.61%0.89%0.87%0.81%0.83%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLAU.L and SAAA.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLAU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLAU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SAAA.L.

GLAU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD, while SAAA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLAU.L and 0.20% for SAAA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLAU.L and SAAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer