GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L
GLAU.L (SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged) and GLAG.L (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged) are both Global Bonds funds from State Street - GLAU.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD while GLAG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLAU.L returned 0.73%/yr vs -1.75%/yr for GLAG.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLAU.L achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than GLAG.L's 0.02% return.
GLAU.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAG.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.75%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAU.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged | 0.41% | 4.62% | 3.58% | 6.07% | -11.13% | -1.01% | 5.46% | 7.95% | 1.58% |
GLAG.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged | 0.02% | 7.79% | -1.43% | 5.30% | -16.03% | -5.16% | 9.05% | 5.87% | -0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLAU.L and GLAG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, GLAU.L and GLAG.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Communication Services
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Healthcare
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Consumer Cyclical
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Energy
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Utilities
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Industrials
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Consumer Defensive
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Technology
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Real Estate
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Basic Materials
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLAU.L
GLAG.L
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLAU.L | GLAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.08 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 0.65 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 1.80 | +3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLAU.L | GLAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 0.46 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | -0.27 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | -0.01 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLAU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.72%, smaller than the maximum GLAG.L drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAU.L and GLAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLAU.L | GLAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -25.75% | +11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.36% | -3.53% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.11% | -6.86% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.58% | -24.25% | +9.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -10.98% | +9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -9.75% | +6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 1.28% | -0.44% |
Volatility
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) is 1.56%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that GLAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLAU.L | GLAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 1.98% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 3.82% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61% | 4.96% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 6.50% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 5.79% | +1.24% |
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLAU.L and GLAG.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Dividend Comparison
GLAU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, which matches GLAG.L's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAG.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged | 3.15% | 3.00% | 2.80% | 2.02% | 1.48% | 1.24% | 1.47% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
GLAU.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged | 3.15% | 3.02% | 2.71% | 2.02% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 1.51% | 1.25% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLAU.L and GLAG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLAU.L and GLAG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
GLAU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD, while GLAG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD.
Find the right allocation for GLAU.L and GLAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer