PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAU.L achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than GLAG.L's 0.02% return.


GLAU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*

GLAG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.44%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
3.39%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
0.41%4.62%3.58%6.07%-11.13%-1.01%5.46%7.95%1.58%
GLAG.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
0.02%7.79%-1.43%5.30%-16.03%-5.16%9.05%5.87%-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GLAU.L and GLAG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.36

Over the past year, GLAU.L and GLAG.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLAU.L
GLAG.L

Financial Services

4.5%
13.0%

Communication Services

0.9%
2.1%

Healthcare

0.8%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
1.3%

Energy

0.7%
2.1%

Utilities

0.6%
1.4%

Industrials

0.6%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
1.3%

Technology

0.5%
1.6%

Real Estate

0.3%
0.2%

Basic Materials

0.2%
0.2%

Financial Services

GLAU.L
4.5%
GLAG.L
13.0%

Communication Services

GLAU.L
0.9%
GLAG.L
2.1%

Healthcare

GLAU.L
0.8%
GLAG.L
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GLAU.L
0.7%
GLAG.L
1.3%

Energy

GLAU.L
0.7%
GLAG.L
2.1%

Utilities

GLAU.L
0.6%
GLAG.L
1.4%

Industrials

GLAU.L
0.6%
GLAG.L
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

GLAU.L
0.6%
GLAG.L
1.3%

Technology

GLAU.L
0.5%
GLAG.L
1.6%

Real Estate

GLAU.L
0.3%
GLAG.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

GLAU.L
0.2%
GLAG.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAU.L
GLAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAG.L
GLAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GLAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLAU.LGLAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.08

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.65

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

1.80

+3.27

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the GLAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAU.L and GLAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLAU.LGLAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

0.46

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.27

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.01

+0.84

Drawdowns

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.72%, smaller than the maximum GLAG.L drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAU.L and GLAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLAU.LGLAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-25.75%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.36%

-3.53%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.11%

-6.86%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.58%

-24.25%

+9.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-10.98%

+9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-9.75%

+6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.28%

-0.44%

Volatility

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) is 1.56%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that GLAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLAU.LGLAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

1.98%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

3.82%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

4.96%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.86%

6.50%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

5.79%

+1.24%

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLAU.L and GLAG.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLAU.L vs. GLAG.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, which matches GLAG.L's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GLAG.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
3.15%3.00%2.80%2.02%1.48%1.24%1.47%0.84%0.00%
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
3.15%3.02%2.71%2.02%1.40%1.21%1.51%1.25%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLAU.L and GLAG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLAU.L and GLAG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

GLAU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD, while GLAG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLAU.L and GLAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer