GLAPY vs. CASY
GLAPY (Glanbia PLC ADR) and CASY (Casey's General Stores, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — GLAPY in Packaged Foods, CASY in Grocery Stores. Over the past 10 years, GLAPY returned 6.43%/yr vs 20.93%/yr for CASY. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GLAPY vs. CASY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLAPY achieves a 68.52% return, which is significantly higher than CASY's 48.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GLAPY has underperformed CASY with an annualized return of 6.43%, while CASY has yielded a comparatively higher 20.93% annualized return.
GLAPY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 67.49%
- YTD
- 68.52%
- 1Y
- 107.79%
- 3Y*
- 28.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.43%
CASY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- 6M
- 38.29%
- YTD
- 48.57%
- 1Y
- 59.31%
- 3Y*
- 50.39%
- 5Y*
- 33.73%
- 10Y*
- 20.93%
GLAPY vs. CASY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAPY Glanbia PLC ADR | 68.52% | 19.17% | -8.77% | 65.78% | -23.34% | 8.52% | 14.26% | -37.49% | 6.63% | 10.60% |
CASY Casey's General Stores, Inc. | 48.57% | 40.12% | 45.01% | 23.27% | 14.49% | 11.25% | 13.24% | 25.12% | 15.59% | -4.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLAPY and CASY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2012 | -0.01 |
Fundamentals
GLAPY:
$6.94B
CASY:
$30.34B
GLAPY:
€6.46
CASY:
$19.17
GLAPY:
19.44
CASY:
42.76
GLAPY:
0.98
CASY:
2.04
GLAPY:
0.87
CASY:
1.74
GLAPY:
3.80
CASY:
7.72
GLAPY:
€7.19B
CASY:
$17.56B
GLAPY:
€2.04B
CASY:
$4.32B
GLAPY:
€750.51M
CASY:
$1.58B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLAPY vs. CASY — Risk / Return Rank
GLAPY
CASY
GLAPY vs. CASY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glanbia PLC ADR (GLAPY) and Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLAPY | CASY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.60 | 1.37 | +4.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.68 | 3.58 | +16.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 68.08 | 11.40 | +56.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLAPY vs. CASY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLAPY drawdown since its inception was -56.48%, smaller than the maximum CASY drawdown of -74.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAPY and CASY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLAPY | CASY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.48% | -74.32% | +17.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.51% | -16.07% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.70% | -16.07% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.70% | -17.13% | -27.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.48% | -33.41% | -23.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.53% | +10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.55% | -15.14% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 5.03% | -3.44% |
Volatility
GLAPY vs. CASY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Glanbia PLC ADR (GLAPY) is 6.05%, while Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) has a volatility of 20.93%. This indicates that GLAPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CASY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLAPY | CASY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 20.93% | -14.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.92% | 26.65% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.35% | 31.81% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 27.96% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.83% | 28.20% | +3.63% |
Dividends
GLAPY vs. CASY - Dividend Comparison
GLAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than CASY's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASY Casey's General Stores, Inc. | 0.28% | 0.39% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.86% | 0.89% | 0.77% | 0.70% |
GLAPY Glanbia PLC ADR | 1.75% | 2.56% | 2.69% | 2.14% | 3.09% | 2.36% | 2.29% | 2.40% | 1.61% | 1.32% | 1.65% | 0.68% |
Financials
GLAPY vs. CASY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Glanbia PLC ADR and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GLAPY vs. CASY - Profitability Comparison
GLAPY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Glanbia PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 423.26M and revenue of 1.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.7%.
CASY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 4.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.0%.
GLAPY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Glanbia PLC ADR reported an operating income of 159.51M and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.
CASY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.13B and revenue of 4.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 68.5%.
GLAPY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Glanbia PLC ADR reported a net income of 71.22M and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
CASY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 162.68M and revenue of 4.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLAPY and CASY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CASY has higher volatility (20.93%) compared to GLAPY (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLAPY dropped -56.48% vs CASY's -74.32%.
GLAPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLAPY and CASY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer