GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L
GLAG.L (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged) and GLAU.L (SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged) are both Global Bonds funds from State Street - GLAG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD while GLAU.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLAG.L returned -1.75%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for GLAU.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLAG.L achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than GLAU.L's 0.41% return.
GLAG.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.75%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAU.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAG.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged | 0.02% | 7.79% | -1.43% | 5.30% | -16.03% | -5.16% | 9.05% | 5.87% | -0.42% |
GLAU.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged | 0.41% | 4.62% | 3.58% | 6.07% | -11.13% | -1.01% | 5.46% | 7.95% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLAG.L and GLAU.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, GLAG.L and GLAU.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Financial Services
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Energy
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Communication Services
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Industrials
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Technology
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Healthcare
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Utilities
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Consumer Cyclical
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Consumer Defensive
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Basic Materials
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Real Estate
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLAG.L
GLAU.L
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLAG.L | GLAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.23 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.95 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 5.07 | -3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLAG.L | GLAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 1.28 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.24 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.83 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, which is greater than GLAU.L's maximum drawdown of -14.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAG.L and GLAU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLAG.L | GLAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.75% | -14.72% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.53% | -2.36% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.86% | -3.11% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | -14.58% | -9.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.98% | -1.01% | -9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -3.48% | -6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 0.84% | +0.44% |
Volatility
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) at 1.56%. This indicates that GLAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLAG.L | GLAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 1.56% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 2.72% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96% | 3.61% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.50% | 6.86% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 7.03% | -1.24% |
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLAG.L and GLAU.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLAG.L vs. GLAU.L - Dividend Comparison
GLAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, which matches GLAU.L's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAG.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged | 3.15% | 3.00% | 2.80% | 2.02% | 1.48% | 1.24% | 1.47% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
GLAU.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged | 3.15% | 3.02% | 2.71% | 2.02% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 1.51% | 1.25% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLAG.L and GLAU.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLAG.L and GLAU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
GLAG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while GLAU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD.
Find the right allocation for GLAG.L and GLAU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer