PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLAD.L is traded in USD, while IGLH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IGLH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAD.L achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than IGLH.L's 2.17% return.


GLAD.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.51%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*

IGLH.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
2.17%
6M
0.14%
1Y
1.10%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLAD.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.39%4.72%3.23%6.73%-11.24%-1.59%5.21%-0.04%
IGLH.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.17%8.22%-0.89%10.22%-22.84%-3.35%8.26%3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GLAD.L and IGLH.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.51

The correlation between GLAD.L and IGLH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAD.L
GLAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GLAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLH.L
IGLH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
IGLH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLAD.LIGLH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.03

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

0.21

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

0.46

+4.11

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the IGLH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAD.L and IGLH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLAD.LIGLH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.12

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.20

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.03

+0.25

Drawdowns

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAD.L drawdown since its inception was -15.20%, smaller than the maximum IGLH.L drawdown of -34.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAD.L and IGLH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLAD.LIGLH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.20%

-34.86%

+19.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.30%

-5.18%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.78%

-12.14%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.05%

-34.86%

+19.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-11.04%

+9.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-12.06%

+7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

2.39%

-1.64%

Volatility

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L) is 1.38%, while iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that GLAD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLAD.LIGLH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

2.85%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

7.24%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19%

9.31%

-6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

11.01%

-6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

10.54%

-6.27%

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLAD.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLAD.L vs. IGLH.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GLAD.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLH.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.98%2.91%2.33%1.40%0.73%0.55%0.97%1.19%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLAD.L and IGLH.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLAD.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLAD.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLH.L.

GLAD.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD, while IGLH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLAD.L and 0.25% for IGLH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLAD.L and IGLH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer