GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

GLAB.L (SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged) and FLUC.L (Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - GLAB.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while FLUC.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate - Investment Grade Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLAB.L returned -0.00%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FLUC.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLAB.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FLUC.L.

Performance

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

GLAB.L is traded in GBP, while FLUC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLUC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAB.L achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than FLUC.L's -0.24% return.

GLAB.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 1Y: 3.03%
• 3Y*: 3.78%
• 5Y*: -0.00%
• 10Y*: —

FLUC.L

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.60%
• 6M: -0.67%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 1Y: 3.89%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: 0.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged	0.52%	4.69%	3.04%	5.75%	-12.07%	-1.73%	4.47%	6.44%	0.82%
FLUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	-0.24%	-0.20%	3.86%	2.39%	-5.48%	-1.32%	6.53%	10.17%	4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GLAB.L and FLUC.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2018	0.41

The correlation between GLAB.L and FLUC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAB.L

GLAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GLAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GLAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GLAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FLUC.L

FLUC.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
FLUC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FLUC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FLUC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FLUC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FLUC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLAB.L	FLUC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	0.54	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	0.81	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.10	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	0.74	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.62	1.76	+1.85

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the FLUC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAB.L and FLUC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAB.L drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum FLUC.L drawdown of -17.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAB.L and FLUC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLAB.L	FLUC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.67%	-17.30%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.29%	-5.27%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.52%	-9.19%	+5.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.44%	-14.55%	-0.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-7.60%	+6.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-7.94%	+3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	2.20%	-1.36%

Volatility

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) is 0.86%, while Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that GLAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLUC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLAB.L	FLUC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	1.72%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	5.73%	-3.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11%	7.25%	-4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.48%	9.29%	-4.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.88%	9.88%	-6.00%

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLAB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLUC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLAB.L vs. FLUC.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than FLUC.L's 4.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	4.22%	4.01%	4.26%	3.38%	2.76%	2.17%	2.29%	3.37%	1.61%
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged	3.09%	3.06%	2.70%	1.91%	1.48%	1.18%	1.51%	1.70%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLAB.L and FLUC.L in my portfolio?

GLAB.L and FLUC.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLAB.L or FLUC.L?

On fees, GLAB.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLAB.L or FLUC.L?

GLAB.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLUC.L.

What is the main difference between GLAB.L and FLUC.L?

GLAB.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while FLUC.L is Corporate Bonds. GLAB.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while FLUC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate - Investment Grade Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLAB.L and 0.35% for FLUC.L.