PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GJUN vs. JEPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GJUN vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GJUN having a 4.32% return and JEPI slightly higher at 4.52%.


GJUN

1D
0.39%
1M
0.50%
6M
3.66%
YTD
4.32%
1Y
9.40%
3Y*
10.46%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.97%

JEPI

1D
0.33%
1M
1.27%
6M
2.16%
YTD
4.52%
1Y
11.16%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.08M$3.61M$4.60M
$260.98M$260.42M$297.70M

GJUN vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
4.32%10.00%13.24%6.40%
JEPI
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
4.52%8.09%12.57%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GJUN and JEPI is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2023

0.72

The correlation between GJUN and JEPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GJUN vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GJUN
GJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPI
JEPI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
JEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GJUN vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GJUNJEPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.23

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.52

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

4.32

+11.80

GJUN vs. JEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the JEPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJUN and JEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GJUN vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJUN drawdown since its inception was -10.97%, smaller than the maximum JEPI drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJUN and JEPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GJUNJEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-13.71%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-6.68%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.97%

-13.26%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.68%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-2.13%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

2.36%

-1.81%

Volatility

GJUN vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is 1.93%, while JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that GJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GJUNJEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

2.38%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

6.37%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.69%

8.15%

-3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.78%

11.10%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.78%

10.73%

-2.95%

GJUN vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GJUN vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison

GJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JEPI
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
7.34%8.25%7.33%8.40%11.68%6.59%5.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


GJUN and JEPI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEPI has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to GJUN (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJUN dropped -10.97% vs JEPI's -13.71%.

On 3-year performance, GJUN leads with 10.46% vs 9.21% for JEPI. On fees, JEPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GJUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GJUN has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GJUN.

JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.34%, compared with 0.00% for GJUN.

GJUN is categorized as Options Trading, while JEPI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GJUN and 0.35% for JEPI.

GJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GJUN and JEPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer