GJUN vs. FAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June) and FAPR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - GJUN is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while FAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. GJUN is actively managed, while FAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, GJUN returned 11.40% vs 12.66% for FAPR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

GJUN vs. FAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJUN achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than FAPR's 5.18% return.

GJUN

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 6M: 4.38%
• 1Y: 11.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAPR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 5.18%
• 6M: 6.07%
• 1Y: 12.66%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJUN vs. FAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June	3.73%	10.00%	13.24%	6.43%
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	5.18%	7.58%	18.14%	7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GJUN and FAPR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023	0.89

The correlation between GJUN and FAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

GJUN vs. FAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GJUN	FAPR
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

GJUN vs. FAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJUN

GJUN Risk / Return Rank: 81
GJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
GJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 85
GJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FAPR

FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJUN vs. FAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GJUN	FAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	3.37	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	5.48	-1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.75	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	11.10	-7.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.25	48.99	-27.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GJUN vs. FAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the FAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJUN and FAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GJUN	FAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	3.37	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.87	+0.58

Drawdowns

GJUN vs. FAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJUN drawdown since its inception was -10.97%, smaller than the maximum FAPR drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJUN and FAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GJUN	FAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.97%	-15.96%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-1.15%	-1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.64%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.25%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-2.71%	+1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	0.26%	+0.28%

Volatility

GJUN vs. FAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is 0.32%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that GJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GJUN	FAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.32%	1.43%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.30%	2.83%	+0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.91%	3.79%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.89%	10.49%	-2.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.89%	10.43%	-2.54%

GJUN vs. FAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GJUN and FAPR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

GJUN vs. FAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither GJUN nor FAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GJUN and FAPR in my portfolio?

GJUN and FAPR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GJUN or FAPR?

FAPR has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to GJUN (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GJUN dropped -10.97% vs FAPR's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, GJUN or FAPR?

On 1-year performance, FAPR leads with 12.66% vs 11.40% for GJUN. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, GJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GJUN or FAPR?

Over the 1-year period, FAPR has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GJUN or FAPR?

GJUN and FAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GJUN or FAPR?

GJUN and FAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GJUN and FAPR?

GJUN is categorized as Options Trading, while FAPR is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.