PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GJUN vs. BGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GJUN vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GJUN vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
-0.45%10.00%13.24%6.43%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
0.18%33.03%21.80%5.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJUN achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than BGLD's 0.18% return.


GJUN

1D
1.52%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
1.39%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BGLD

1D
2.63%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
2.66%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GJUN vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GJUN vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJUN
GJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJUN vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GJUNBGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

1.89

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.51

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.34

7.80

+2.54

GJUN vs. BGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the BGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJUN and BGLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GJUNBGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

1.09

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between GJUN and BGLD is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GJUN vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison

GJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.24%.


TTM2025202420232022
GJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
44.24%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%

Drawdowns

GJUN vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJUN drawdown since its inception was -10.97%, smaller than the maximum BGLD drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJUN and BGLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GJUNBGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-16.19%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-11.11%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-7.35%

+5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-3.54%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

2.15%

-0.96%

Volatility

GJUN vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is 2.59%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that GJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GJUNBGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

6.83%

-4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.63%

9.28%

-5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.87%

12.06%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.10%

9.88%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.10%

9.87%

-1.77%