GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GJGB.L (VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF) and RMAU.L (The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - GJGB.L is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while RMAU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GJGB.L returned 18.91%/yr vs 19.72%/yr for RMAU.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GJGB.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RMAU.L.

Performance

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GJGB.L) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

GJGB.L is traded in GBP, while RMAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMAU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GJGB.L achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than RMAU.L's 4.12% return.

GJGB.L

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -7.95%
• YTD: -1.48%
• 6M: 6.02%
• 1Y: 64.29%
• 3Y*: 42.48%
• 5Y*: 18.91%
• 10Y*: —

RMAU.L

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 5.26%
• 1Y: 33.48%
• 3Y*: 28.06%
• 5Y*: 19.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GJGB.L VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF	-1.48%	156.51%	14.83%	1.67%	-2.76%	-22.00%	17.82%
RMAU.L The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities	4.09%	52.84%	28.16%	7.63%	11.68%	-3.23%	8.55%

Correlation

The correlation between GJGB.L and RMAU.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2020	0.57

The correlation between GJGB.L and RMAU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJGB.L

GJGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 40
GJGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GJGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
GJGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GJGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
GJGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 35

RMAU.L

RMAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
RMAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RMAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RMAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RMAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RMAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GJGB.L) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GJGB.L	RMAU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.38	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.80	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	1.82	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	4.96	+0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GJGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the RMAU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GJGB.L and RMAU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GJGB.L	RMAU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.38	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	1.18	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.81	-0.41

Drawdowns

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJGB.L drawdown since its inception was -49.12%, which is greater than RMAU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJGB.L and RMAU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GJGB.L	RMAU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.12%	-23.24%	-25.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.95%	-18.32%	-11.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.95%	-18.32%	-11.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.65%	-18.32%	-18.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.14%	-16.04%	-11.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.35%	-6.62%	-15.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.37%	6.73%	+5.64%

Volatility

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GJGB.L) has a higher volatility of 16.00% compared to The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) at 5.98%. This indicates that GJGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GJGB.L	RMAU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.00%	5.98%	+10.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.81%	21.23%	+15.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.62%	24.08%	+21.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.94%	17.03%	+19.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.80%	20.70%	+16.10%

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAU.L's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

GJGB.L vs. RMAU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GJGB.L nor RMAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GJGB.L and RMAU.L in my portfolio?

GJGB.L and RMAU.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GJGB.L or RMAU.L?

On fees, RMAU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GJGB.L or RMAU.L?

RMAU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GJGB.L.

What is the main difference between GJGB.L and RMAU.L?

GJGB.L is categorized as Gold, while RMAU.L is Commodities. GJGB.L tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while RMAU.L tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GJGB.L and 0.22% for RMAU.L.