PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIUSX vs. FADMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIUSX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIUSX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.12% return.


GIUSX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.63%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
2.66%

FADMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.76%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.71%
1Y
10.02%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIUSX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.53%7.86%2.91%7.07%-16.63%-0.90%14.63%4.47%1.69%
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
3.12%9.01%6.02%9.55%-11.84%3.46%6.72%11.06%-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GIUSX and FADMX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.65

The correlation between GIUSX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIUSX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIUSX
GIUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GIUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GIUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FADMX
FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIUSX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIUSXFADMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

2.85

-1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

4.32

-2.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.60

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.94

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.86

17.30

-10.44

GIUSX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIUSX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIUSXFADMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.85

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.73

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.86

-0.16

Drawdowns

GIUSX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIUSX drawdown since its inception was -22.02%, which is greater than FADMX's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIUSX and FADMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIUSXFADMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.02%

-15.98%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-2.62%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-3.99%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.02%

-15.98%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

0.00%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-3.07%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.60%

+0.37%

Volatility

GIUSX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) at 1.34%. This indicates that GIUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIUSXFADMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.34%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

2.92%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

3.51%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

4.51%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.83%

4.77%

+0.06%

GIUSX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIUSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIUSX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

GIUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FADMX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
4.29%4.33%4.16%4.31%2.91%4.23%3.82%4.34%2.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.79%4.75%4.68%4.39%2.71%3.36%4.36%2.42%2.76%3.47%3.85%4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIUSX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIUSX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to FADMX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIUSX dropped -22.02% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIUSX and FADMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer