GITIX vs. STK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund (GITIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK).

GITIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Sep 30, 1999. STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009.

Performance

GITIX vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund (GITIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GITIX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GITIX Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund	0.00%	20.53%	35.07%	58.26%	-38.95%	21.36%	45.88%	38.48%	2.60%	38.59%
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	4.31%	24.85%	17.74%	46.60%	-30.36%	48.63%	25.39%	52.73%	-14.91%	33.52%

Returns By Period

GITIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STK

• 1D: 5.54%
• 1M: -6.23%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: 46.63%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: 19.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GITIX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GITIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.

STK

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund

GITIX

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund

Return for Risk

GITIX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STK

STK Risk / Return Rank: 91
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 86
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GITIX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund (GITIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GITIX	STK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.64	—

Correlation

The correlation between GITIX and STK is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GITIX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

GITIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.51%, more than STK's 7.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GITIX Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund	23.51%	23.51%	6.78%	0.00%	22.03%	14.83%	7.84%	14.78%	24.21%	7.03%	4.70%	8.33%
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	7.16%	7.38%	16.02%	6.70%	12.62%	8.48%	6.79%	7.86%	14.88%	11.82%	9.87%	10.32%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GITIX	STK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.74%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.59%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-7.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.47%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GITIX	STK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	25.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.83%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	25.91%	—