GIPIX vs. GUG
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) and Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG).
GIPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998. GUG is an actively managed fund by Guggenheim. It was launched on Nov 23, 2021.
Performance
GIPIX vs. GUG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIPIX vs. GUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | -2.44% | 10.80% | 8.51% | 12.49% | -14.43% | 0.90% |
GUG Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund | 1.54% | 13.12% | 11.46% | 20.68% | -26.55% | -0.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIPIX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than GUG's 1.54% return.
GIPIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 8.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
GUG
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 10.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIPIX vs. GUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GUG's 3.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GIPIX vs. GUG — Risk / Return Rank
GIPIX
GUG
GIPIX vs. GUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) and Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIPIX | GUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.80 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.18 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.18 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 3.37 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIPIX | GUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.80 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.17 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIPIX and GUG is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GIPIX vs. GUG - Dividend Comparison
GIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, less than GUG's 9.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.95% | 5.22% | 4.06% | 2.12% | 4.56% | 6.37% | 2.25% | 2.51% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.46% | 5.73% |
GUG Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund | 9.36% | 9.30% | 9.58% | 9.72% | 9.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GIPIX vs. GUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIPIX drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum GUG drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIPIX and GUG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIPIX | GUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.46% | -32.78% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -8.45% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.50% | -5.44% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -12.02% | +8.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 2.94% | -1.29% |
Volatility
GIPIX vs. GUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) is 2.94%, while Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that GIPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIPIX | GUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 3.35% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.78% | 8.66% | -3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.09% | 13.43% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.93% | 17.72% | -9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 17.72% | -9.66% |