PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINX vs. AVGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINX vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINX achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 16.61% return.


GINX

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.89%
YTD
11.98%
6M
11.63%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVGV

1D
-1.36%
1M
0.85%
YTD
16.61%
6M
15.61%
1Y
35.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINX vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
11.98%25.06%5.77%
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
16.61%22.57%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GINX and AVGV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

0.84

The correlation between GINX and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINX vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINX
AVGV

Financial Services

31.1%
21.3%

Technology

11.1%
12.1%

Energy

9.6%
12.4%

Healthcare

9.5%
4.5%

Industrials

9.1%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
5.2%

Utilities

5.7%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
14.7%

Basic Materials

4.2%
7.2%

Communication Services

4.1%
5.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.7%

Financial Services

GINX
31.1%
AVGV
21.3%

Technology

GINX
11.1%
AVGV
12.1%

Energy

GINX
9.6%
AVGV
12.4%

Healthcare

GINX
9.5%
AVGV
4.5%

Industrials

GINX
9.1%
AVGV
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

GINX
8.2%
AVGV
5.2%

Utilities

GINX
5.7%
AVGV
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GINX
5.7%
AVGV
14.7%

Basic Materials

GINX
4.2%
AVGV
7.2%

Communication Services

GINX
4.1%
AVGV
5.0%

Real Estate

GINX
1.6%
AVGV
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINX vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINX
GINX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINX vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GINXAVGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.47

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

4.36

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.79

16.95

-4.16

GINX vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINX and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GINX vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINX drawdown since its inception was -12.53%, smaller than the maximum AVGV drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINX and AVGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINXAVGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.53%

-17.03%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-8.12%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.88%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-2.27%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.09%

+0.24%

Volatility

GINX vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) is 3.70%, while Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that GINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINXAVGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

4.56%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

10.46%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.13%

13.41%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

15.03%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

15.03%

-1.19%

GINX vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINX vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

GINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than AVGV's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
2.49%1.98%2.32%1.14%
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
2.18%2.81%2.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GINX and AVGV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGV has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to GINX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINX dropped -12.53% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 35.25% vs 29.75% for GINX. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, GINX has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 35.25% return vs 29.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for GINX.

AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 2.18% for GINX.

They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for GINX and 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINX and AVGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer