GIND vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GIND is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. GIND is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. Over the past year, GIND returned -10.21% vs 21.34% for CMDT. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. GIND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

GIND vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIND achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 13.43% return.

GIND

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: -8.60%
• 6M: -9.40%
• 1Y: -10.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMDT

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIND vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	-8.60%	4.70%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	13.43%	5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GIND and CMDT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

GIND vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIND

GIND Risk / Return Rank: 4
GIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Omega Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GIND Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 50
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIND vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIND	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	1.71	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	2.39	-3.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.29	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	1.93	-2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	9.62	-10.63

GIND vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIND Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIND and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIND vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIND drawdown since its inception was -22.97%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIND and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIND	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.97%	-11.11%	-11.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.97%	-11.11%	-11.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.34%	-11.11%	-2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-2.77%	-4.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.10%	2.25%	+7.85%

Volatility

GIND vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) at 3.26%. This indicates that GIND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIND	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	3.26%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.50%	10.60%	+3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	12.65%	+4.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	12.24%	+4.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.22%	12.24%	+4.98%

GIND vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIND vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

GIND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.67%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIND and CMDT in my portfolio?

GIND and CMDT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIND or CMDT?

GIND has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to CMDT (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIND dropped -22.97% vs CMDT's -11.11%.

Which ETF is better, GIND or CMDT?

On 1-year performance, CMDT leads with 21.34% vs -10.21% for GIND. On fees, CMDT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CMDT has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GIND or CMDT?

Over the 1-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 21.34% return vs -10.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIND or CMDT?

CMDT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GIND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIND or CMDT?

CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for GIND.

What is the main difference between GIND and CMDT?

GIND is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CMDT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GIND and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.