PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIN.L vs. V3AM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3AM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIN.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than V3AM.L's 12.15% return.


GIN.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
2.94%
6M
2.23%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
33.49%

V3AM.L

1D
0.02%
1M
6.38%
YTD
12.15%
6M
12.78%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GIN.L
SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist
2.94%3.55%2.09%1.50%-3.30%1,069.55%
V3AM.L
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
12.15%12.40%19.59%18.06%-13.39%17.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GIN.L and V3AM.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.37

The correlation between GIN.L and V3AM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GIN.L
V3AM.L

Utilities

41.4%
0.4%

Industrials

38.1%
6.4%

Energy

12.1%
0.0%

Healthcare

3.9%
9.7%

Real Estate

2.9%
3.0%

Communication Services

1.1%
10.0%

Technology

0.3%
33.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
11.2%

Financial Services

0.1%
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.0%
3.4%

Utilities

GIN.L
41.4%
V3AM.L
0.4%

Industrials

GIN.L
38.1%
V3AM.L
6.4%

Energy

GIN.L
12.1%
V3AM.L
0.0%

Healthcare

GIN.L
3.9%
V3AM.L
9.7%

Real Estate

GIN.L
2.9%
V3AM.L
3.0%

Communication Services

GIN.L
1.1%
V3AM.L
10.0%

Technology

GIN.L
0.3%
V3AM.L
33.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GIN.L
0.2%
V3AM.L
11.2%

Financial Services

GIN.L
0.1%
V3AM.L
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

GIN.L
0.0%
V3AM.L
4.4%

Basic Materials

GIN.L
0.0%
V3AM.L
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIN.L
GIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

V3AM.L
V3AM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
V3AM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3AM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3AM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
V3AM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3AM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3AM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIN.LV3AM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.50

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.73

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.27

15.11

-10.84

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the V3AM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIN.L and V3AM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIN.LV3AM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.67

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.84

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.89

-0.78

Drawdowns

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIN.L drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum V3AM.L drawdown of -19.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIN.L and V3AM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIN.LV3AM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-19.25%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-8.18%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

-19.25%

+11.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.40%

-19.25%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-0.57%

-3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-4.85%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.02%

-0.04%

Volatility

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) is 1.91%, while Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3AM.L) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that GIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3AM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIN.LV3AM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

3.51%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

8.67%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.14%

11.41%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.56%

13.65%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

311.49%

13.59%

+297.90%

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIN.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than V3AM.L's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIN.L vs. V3AM.L - Dividend Comparison

GIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V3AM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIN.L
SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.80%2.47%87.32%2.23%2.37%2.16%2.30%2.17%1.81%
V3AM.L
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
1.09%1.23%1.28%1.45%1.70%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIN.L and V3AM.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3AM.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3AM.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GIN.L.

GIN.L is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while V3AM.L is Global Equities. GIN.L tracks Morningstar EAA USD Mod Tgt Alloc NR USD, while V3AM.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GIN.L and 0.24% for V3AM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIN.L and V3AM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer