GIN.L vs. USDV.L
GIN.L (SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both exchange-traded funds - GIN.L is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Morningstar EAA USD Mod Tgt Alloc NR USD, while USDV.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GIN.L returned 33.49%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for USDV.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIN.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.
Performance
GIN.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIN.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, GIN.L has outperformed USDV.L with an annualized return of 33.49%, while USDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.
GIN.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 33.49%
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
GIN.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIN.L SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist | 2.94% | 3.55% | 2.09% | 1.50% | -3.30% | 1,062.98% | 3.81% | 14.60% | 1.51% | 3.01% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 7.22% | 1.15% | 9.34% | -3.52% | 11.58% | 26.74% | -2.72% | 19.69% | 1.49% | 6.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIN.L and USDV.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2015 | 0.63 |
The correlation between GIN.L and USDV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GIN.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GIN.L
USDV.L
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
GIN.L
USDV.L
Industrials
GIN.L
USDV.L
Energy
GIN.L
USDV.L
Healthcare
GIN.L
USDV.L
Real Estate
GIN.L
USDV.L
Communication Services
GIN.L
USDV.L
Technology
GIN.L
USDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
GIN.L
USDV.L
Financial Services
GIN.L
USDV.L
Consumer Defensive
GIN.L
USDV.L
Basic Materials
GIN.L
USDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIN.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
GIN.L
USDV.L
GIN.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIN.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.12 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 5.42 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIN.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.44 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.64 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.84 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
GIN.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIN.L drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIN.L and USDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIN.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -27.80% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -6.60% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.63% | -16.30% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.40% | -16.30% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.71% | -27.80% | +12.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -3.68% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -4.14% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.58% | -0.60% |
Volatility
GIN.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) is 1.91%, while SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that GIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIN.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 2.53% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.15% | 7.19% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.14% | 9.69% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 12.78% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 311.49% | 15.33% | +296.16% |
GIN.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIN.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIN.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison
GIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIN.L SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.80% | 2.47% | 87.32% | 2.23% | 2.37% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 2.17% | 1.81% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIN.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USDV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USDV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GIN.L.
GIN.L is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. GIN.L tracks Morningstar EAA USD Mod Tgt Alloc NR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GIN.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.
Find the right allocation for GIN.L and USDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer