GIN.L vs. SPY5.L
GIN.L (SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist) and SPY5.L (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIN.L is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Morningstar EAA USD Mod Tgt Alloc NR USD, while SPY5.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GIN.L returned 33.49%/yr vs 16.22%/yr for SPY5.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIN.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY5.L.
Performance
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GIN.L is traded in GBP, while SPY5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIN.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than SPY5.L's 10.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GIN.L has outperformed SPY5.L with an annualized return of 33.49%, while SPY5.L has yielded a comparatively lower 16.22% annualized return.
GIN.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 33.49%
SPY5.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 29.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.22%
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIN.L SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist | 2.94% | 3.55% | 2.09% | 1.50% | -3.30% | 1,062.98% | 3.81% | 14.60% | 1.51% | 3.01% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.76% | 9.06% | 27.55% | 20.31% | -9.02% | 30.50% | 14.06% | 25.87% | 0.54% | 11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIN.L and SPY5.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2015 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GIN.L and SPY5.L has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Industrials
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Energy
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Healthcare
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Real Estate
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Communication Services
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Technology
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Consumer Cyclical
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Financial Services
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Consumer Defensive
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Basic Materials
GIN.L
SPY5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank
GIN.L
SPY5.L
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIN.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.45 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 4.02 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 13.69 | -9.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIN.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.45 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.97 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.98 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 1.01 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIN.L drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum SPY5.L drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIN.L and SPY5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIN.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -25.97% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -7.19% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.63% | -21.10% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.40% | -21.10% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.71% | -25.97% | +10.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -0.19% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -3.27% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.12% | -0.14% |
Volatility
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) is 1.91%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that GIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIN.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 3.42% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.15% | 8.52% | -2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.14% | 11.82% | -3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 15.35% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 311.49% | 16.47% | +295.02% |
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIN.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIN.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison
GIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIN.L SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.80% | 2.47% | 87.32% | 2.23% | 2.37% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 2.17% | 1.81% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 2.29% | 1.64% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIN.L and SPY5.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GIN.L.
GIN.L is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SPY5.L is S&P 500. GIN.L tracks Morningstar EAA USD Mod Tgt Alloc NR USD, while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GIN.L and 0.09% for SPY5.L.
Find the right allocation for GIN.L and SPY5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer