GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO
GIN.L (SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist) and FEQT.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. GIN.L is passively managed, while FEQT.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, GIN.L returned 8.48% vs 24.92% for FEQT.NEO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIN.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FEQT.NEO.
Performance
GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GIN.L is traded in GBP, while FEQT.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FEQT.NEO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIN.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than FEQT.NEO's 9.92% return.
GIN.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 33.49%
FEQT.NEO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GIN.L SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist | 2.94% | 3.55% | 1.16% |
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund | 9.92% | 16.23% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIN.L and FEQT.NEO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
GIN.L
FEQT.NEO
GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIN.L | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 3.27 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 14.08 | -9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIN.L | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.35 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 1.42 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIN.L drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, which is greater than FEQT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -14.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIN.L and FEQT.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIN.L | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -14.74% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -7.66% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -0.56% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -1.94% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.77% | +0.21% |
Volatility
GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist (GIN.L) is 1.91%, while Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that GIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIN.L | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 3.49% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.15% | 8.30% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.14% | 10.64% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 12.25% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 311.49% | 12.25% | +299.24% |
GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIN.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIN.L vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison
GIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEQT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund | 0.82% | 0.91% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIN.L SPDR Morningstar Multi-Asset Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.80% | 2.47% | 87.32% | 2.23% | 2.37% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 2.17% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIN.L and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GIN.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIN.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GIN.L and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.
Find the right allocation for GIN.L and FEQT.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer