PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILS.L vs. UKG5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) and L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (UKG5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILS.L achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than UKG5.L's 0.48% return.


GILS.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.61%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-4.24%
1Y
-0.97%
3Y*
-0.50%
5Y*
-6.57%
10Y*
-3.32%

UKG5.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
-1.35%1.70%-5.79%1.51%-25.53%0.47%
UKG5.L
L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
0.48%5.06%2.37%3.91%-5.07%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GILS.L and UKG5.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2021

0.61

Over the past year, GILS.L and UKG5.L have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILS.L
GILS.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GILS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GILS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

UKG5.L
UKG5.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UKG5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UKG5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UKG5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UKG5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
UKG5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) and L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (UKG5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILS.LUKG5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.33

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

1.62

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

5.58

-5.93

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the UKG5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILS.L and UKG5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILS.LUKG5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

1.62

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.52

-0.51

Drawdowns

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, which is greater than UKG5.L's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILS.L and UKG5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILS.LUKG5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.75%

-8.78%

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-1.87%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.33%

-1.87%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.00%

-0.69%

-35.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-2.40%

-9.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

0.55%

+2.22%

Volatility

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (UKG5.L) at 0.90%. This indicates that GILS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UKG5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILS.LUKG5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

0.90%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.64%

1.68%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.67%

1.88%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.11%

2.80%

+7.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.06%

2.80%

+6.26%

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than UKG5.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GILS.L vs. UKG5.L - Dividend Comparison

GILS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UKG5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
UKG5.L
L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
3.94%3.94%3.66%2.02%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GILS.L and UKG5.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GILS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GILS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for UKG5.L.

GILS.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks, while UKG5.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Lyxor and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for GILS.L and 0.06% for UKG5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILS.L and UKG5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer