GILE.L vs. ITPS.L
GILE.L (iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)) and ITPS.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds from iShares - GILE.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg EUR while ITPS.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GILE.L returned -2.68%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for ITPS.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GILE.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ITPS.L.
Performance
GILE.L vs. ITPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GILE.L is traded in EUR, while ITPS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ITPS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILE.L achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than ITPS.L's 2.31% return.
GILE.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 2.19%
- 3Y*
- 0.90%
- 5Y*
- -2.68%
- 10Y*
- —
ITPS.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 1.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
GILE.L vs. ITPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILE.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.77% | 2.28% | -2.12% | 1.92% | -19.12% | 4.65% | 7.55% | 5.80% | -2.82% | 1.14% |
ITPS.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.31% | -5.50% | 8.57% | -0.01% | -7.38% | 14.76% | 1.30% | 12.03% | 2.96% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILE.L and ITPS.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2017 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GILE.L and ITPS.L has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILE.L vs. ITPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
GILE.L
ITPS.L
GILE.L vs. ITPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILE.L | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 0.78 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | 2.01 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILE.L | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.22 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.21 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
GILE.L vs. ITPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILE.L drawdown since its inception was -24.70%, smaller than the maximum ITPS.L drawdown of -39.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILE.L and ITPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILE.L | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.70% | -39.91% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -3.82% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.01% | -10.94% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.70% | -15.19% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.40% | -8.10% | -10.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -11.29% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.48% | -0.47% |
Volatility
GILE.L vs. ITPS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L) have volatilities of 1.43% and 1.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILE.L | ITPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 1.42% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.26% | 4.35% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.52% | 6.16% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.79% | 8.66% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 9.15% | -2.00% |
GILE.L vs. ITPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ITPS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GILE.L vs. ITPS.L - Dividend Comparison
GILE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while ITPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILE.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.14% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 0.91% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 1.12% | 2.13% | 0.41% |
ITPS.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GILE.L and ITPS.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITPS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITPS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GILE.L.
GILE.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg EUR, while ITPS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GILE.L and 0.12% for ITPS.L.
Find the right allocation for GILE.L and ITPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer