PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILD vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GILD vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 8.28%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.


GILD

1D
0.09%
1M
-6.24%
YTD
3.22%
6M
0.82%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
8.28%

USFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILD vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
3.22%36.59%18.68%-1.99%23.63%29.95%-6.70%7.88%-9.92%2.96%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.82%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GILD and USFR is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILD vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILD
GILD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILD Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILD vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GILDUSFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-48.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

13.31

-12.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

201.33

-200.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

779.76

-777.34

GILD vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILD Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILD and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GILD vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILDUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.83%

-1.36%

-69.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.59%

-0.02%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-0.06%

-26.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

-0.18%

-26.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.47%

-0.80%

-29.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.68%

0.00%

-18.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.15%

-0.15%

-22.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

0.01%

+8.19%

Volatility

GILD vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that GILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILDUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

0.09%

+7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.80%

0.19%

+18.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.44%

0.27%

+26.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.16%

0.40%

+23.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.52%

0.78%

+24.74%

Dividends

GILD vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than USFR's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.57%2.57%3.33%3.70%3.40%3.91%4.67%3.88%3.65%2.90%2.57%1.27%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.90%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GILD and USFR have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GILD has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILD dropped -70.83% vs USFR's -1.36%.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.67 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILD and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer