PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILD vs. GD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GILD vs. GD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than GD's 2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has underperformed GD with an annualized return of 8.00%, while GD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.


GILD

1D
-0.82%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
4.96%
6M
7.00%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
8.00%

GD

1D
-1.61%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
2.13%
6M
2.33%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILD vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
4.96%36.59%18.68%-1.99%23.63%29.95%-6.70%7.88%-9.92%2.96%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
2.13%30.39%3.52%7.13%21.69%43.77%-13.14%14.80%-21.34%19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GILD and GD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1992

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILD:

$160.64B

GD:

$93.43B

EPS

GILD:

$7.35

GD:

$15.92

PE Ratio

GILD:

17.43

GD:

21.41

PEG Ratio

GILD:

0.04

GD:

2.71

PS Ratio

GILD:

5.40

GD:

1.73

PB Ratio

GILD:

6.83

GD:

3.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILD:

$29.74B

GD:

$53.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILD:

$18.74B

GD:

$7.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

GILD:

$12.88B

GD:

$6.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILD vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILD
GILD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILD vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILDGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.24

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.77

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

6.11

-3.76

GILD vs. GD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILD Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the GD Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILD and GD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILDGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.22

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.72

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.51

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.57

-0.18

Drawdowns

GILD vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, smaller than the maximum GD drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and GD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILDGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.83%

-75.67%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.65%

-14.53%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-22.55%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

-22.55%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.47%

-51.63%

+21.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.31%

-6.79%

-10.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.16%

-15.61%

-6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

4.19%

+3.03%

Volatility

GILD vs. GD - Volatility Comparison

Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) at 5.72%. This indicates that GILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILDGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

5.72%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

17.14%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.29%

21.02%

+5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.03%

20.40%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

22.71%

+2.78%

Dividends

GILD vs. GD - Dividend Comparison

GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than GD's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.79%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.49%2.57%3.33%3.70%3.40%3.91%4.67%3.88%3.65%2.90%2.57%1.27%

Financials

GILD vs. GD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and General Dynamics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
6.96B
13.48B
(GILD) Total Revenue
(GD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GILD vs. GD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and General Dynamics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
1.1%
10.5%
Portfolio components
GILD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.

GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.

GILD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

GILD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GILD and GD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GILD has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to GD (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILD dropped -70.83% vs GD's -75.67%.

GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILD and GD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer