PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILD vs. FFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GILD vs. FFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than FFIV's 55.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has underperformed FFIV with an annualized return of 8.00%, while FFIV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


GILD

1D
-0.82%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
4.96%
6M
7.00%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
8.00%

FFIV

1D
0.72%
1M
11.91%
YTD
55.21%
6M
59.62%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILD vs. FFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
4.96%36.59%18.68%-1.99%23.63%29.95%-6.70%7.88%-9.92%2.96%
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
55.21%1.51%40.50%24.72%-41.36%39.09%25.99%-13.81%23.48%-9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GILD and FFIV is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 1999

0.27

The correlation between GILD and FFIV shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILD:

$160.64B

FFIV:

$22.70B

EPS

GILD:

$7.35

FFIV:

$12.19

PE Ratio

GILD:

17.43

FFIV:

32.50

PEG Ratio

GILD:

0.04

FFIV:

1.42

PS Ratio

GILD:

5.40

FFIV:

9.54

PB Ratio

GILD:

6.83

FFIV:

6.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILD:

$29.74B

FFIV:

$2.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILD:

$18.74B

FFIV:

$2.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

GILD:

$12.88B

FFIV:

$889.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILD vs. FFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILD
GILD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FFIV
FFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILD vs. FFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILDFFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.20

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

0.99

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

2.17

+0.18

GILD vs. FFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILD Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the FFIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILD and FFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILDFFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.02

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.54

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.43

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.27

+0.11

Drawdowns

GILD vs. FFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, smaller than the maximum FFIV drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and FFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILDFFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.83%

-97.59%

+26.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.65%

-34.73%

+17.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-34.73%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

-47.42%

+20.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.47%

-54.59%

+24.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.31%

-3.16%

-14.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.16%

-40.19%

+18.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

15.76%

-8.54%

Volatility

GILD vs. FFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) is 6.75%, while F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that GILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILDFFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

9.07%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

24.96%

-6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.29%

33.52%

-7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.03%

30.02%

-5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

29.57%

-4.08%

Dividends

GILD vs. FFIV - Dividend Comparison

GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while FFIV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.49%2.57%3.33%3.70%3.40%3.91%4.67%3.88%3.65%2.90%2.57%1.27%

Financials

GILD vs. FFIV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and F5 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
6.96B
0
(GILD) Total Revenue
(FFIV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GILD and FFIV have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFIV has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to GILD (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILD dropped -70.83% vs FFIV's -97.59%.

FFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILD and FFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer