PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIIYX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIIYX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds International Equity Index Fund (GIIYX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GIIYX having a 9.27% return and FHLFX slightly higher at 9.53%.


GIIYX

1D
0.32%
1M
3.87%
YTD
9.27%
6M
11.52%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
8.84%

FHLFX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.53%
6M
12.09%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIIYX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GIIYX
GuideStone Funds International Equity Index Fund
9.27%31.38%4.66%18.04%-15.71%10.39%8.20%21.21%-10.55%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.53%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GIIYX and FHLFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.98

The correlation between GIIYX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIIYX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIIYX
GIIYX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GIIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GIIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIIYX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds International Equity Index Fund (GIIYX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIIYXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

2.10

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.91

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.82

7.17

-0.35

GIIYX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIIYX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIIYXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.47

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.56

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

GIIYX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIIYX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FHLFX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIIYX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIIYXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-33.58%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-11.37%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.50%

-13.62%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.75%

-29.36%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.42%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-6.11%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.03%

-0.02%

Volatility

GIIYX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds International Equity Index Fund (GIIYX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIIYXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.64%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

12.08%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

14.83%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

15.98%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

17.64%

-0.89%

GIIYX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIIYX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GIIYX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

GIIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%
GIIYX
GuideStone Funds International Equity Index Fund
5.45%5.95%3.01%3.06%3.00%5.44%1.99%3.03%1.44%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GIIYX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GIIYX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to FHLFX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIIYX dropped -32.55% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIIYX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer