DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAGB.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L).
DAGB.L and BCHS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DAGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Apr 30, 2021. BCHS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 8, 2019. Both DAGB.L and BCHS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAGB.L VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc | -9.88% | 2.77% | 31.18% | 325.83% | -85.21% | -24.14% |
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | -5.58% | 35.24% | 18.50% | 58.28% | -46.25% | -2.16% |
Different Trading Currencies
DAGB.L is traded in GBP, while BCHS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCHS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAGB.L achieves a -9.88% return, which is significantly lower than BCHS.L's -5.58% return.
DAGB.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -9.44%
- YTD
- -9.88%
- 6M
- -32.68%
- 1Y
- 53.86%
- 3Y*
- 44.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCHS.L
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -5.58%
- 6M
- -13.64%
- 1Y
- 51.78%
- 3Y*
- 29.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DAGB.L and BCHS.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Return for Risk
DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L — Risk / Return Rank
DAGB.L
BCHS.L
DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAGB.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAGB.L | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.80 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 1.67 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 3.60 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAGB.L | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.58 | -0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAGB.L and BCHS.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DAGB.L nor BCHS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAGB.L drawdown since its inception was -91.23%, which is greater than BCHS.L's maximum drawdown of -55.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAGB.L and BCHS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAGB.L | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.23% | -55.89% | -35.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.63% | -29.49% | -16.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.64% | -26.72% | -26.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.23% | -21.65% | -36.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.82% | 13.67% | +9.15% |
Volatility
DAGB.L vs. BCHS.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAGB.L) has a higher volatility of 14.91% compared to Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) at 11.20%. This indicates that DAGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAGB.L | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.91% | 11.20% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.14% | 29.70% | +16.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.33% | 40.98% | +20.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.25% | 35.66% | +36.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.25% | 34.34% | +37.91% |