GIBIX vs. PDBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX).
GIBIX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997.
Performance
GIBIX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIBIX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIBIX Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund | -0.73% | 8.22% | 3.18% | 7.45% | -16.38% | -0.58% | 14.94% | 4.45% | 0.89% | 6.50% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.53% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIBIX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than PDBZX's -0.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GIBIX having a 2.94% annualized return and PDBZX not far behind at 2.93%.
GIBIX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.65%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIBIX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GIBIX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
GIBIX
PDBZX
GIBIX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIBIX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.48 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.75 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 5.12 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIBIX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.17 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.55 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.09 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIBIX and PDBZX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GIBIX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
GIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than PDBZX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIBIX Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund | 4.67% | 5.03% | 4.71% | 4.44% | 3.08% | 3.36% | 4.80% | 2.38% | 3.25% | 3.38% | 4.68% | 4.39% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.19% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
GIBIX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIBIX drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, roughly equal to the maximum PDBZX drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIBIX and PDBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIBIX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.44% | -20.88% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -3.06% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.44% | -20.81% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.44% | -20.88% | -0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -2.52% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -2.31% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.05% | -0.10% |
Volatility
GIBIX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) is 1.59%, while PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that GIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIBIX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 1.72% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 2.71% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 4.59% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 6.00% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 5.34% | -0.60% |